Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat

You failed to address my second piece of evidence.


13 posted on 09/19/2008 5:26:27 PM PDT by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Truthsearcher
You failed to address my second piece of evidence.

Ireland's rate of 2 per 100,000 would tend to suggest that either (1) In the U.S., non-life-threatening pregnancies are more likely to end in abortion than life-threatening ones, or (2) some factor other than abortion causes Ireland to have a maternal fatality rate 1/6 that of the U.S.

If Ireland's lower maternal fatality rate was due to factors other than abortion, any attempt to judge the effect of abortion on it would be meaningless. If the lower rate is due to the abortion ban, that would suggest that life-threatening pregnancies are kept (versus aborted) at a disproportionate rate compared to non-life-threatening ones. I suppose that's possible, but it seems unlikely.

14 posted on 09/19/2008 5:33:12 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson