Posted on 09/19/2008 12:52:19 AM PDT by neverdem
I think your suspicions on why the ‘wall’ came to be are spot on. I think it might have gone ever deeper, like a preemptive strike to make sure NOTHING could be used to put two and two together and swerve into some illegal activity involving people in high places.
What a thorn in the flesh of America this lady, and dozens of other ‘public servants’, has been. Actually, she’s far beyond thorn in the flesh and is off the scale, somewhere well above boil on the butt.
Amen! Some people think corporate behavior is pure free enterprise in action, but an oligarchy of elitists on boards of directors works to keep executive salaries ridiculously high, even when companies are stagnating or losing money. Also, boards nowadays have to be "diverse" and have token women or minorities, whether they are qualified or not.
I would add "concentrating" power to that, but not as a blanket statement.
Granted, I work almost directly for some of the most powerful people in a mid-sized midwestern city, the patterns are the same where ever a board happens to be - there are those in power who don't give a darn who they step on to get ahead and then there are those who go out of their way to help others. And on each side they tend to congregate with each other, be on each other's boards, etc. These are the people they know (time to widen circles, IMO). Please, don't paint absolutely all wealthy and powerful people with the same brush because they are not all alike and there are some that are actually very generous and quite principled.
Gorelick, OTOH, belongs in federal prison for treason, stealing, etc., for the rest of her life after her assets are seized and used to help settle the debt she foisted on us.
It will all come out someday, probably after the usefulness of whomever it is they have the goods on is used up. The sad thing is that they will use the info to pull the strings for 16 plus years then spill the beans when the info is no longer useful to control events.
Wow. I'll just say that such a scenario would be unacceptable, and leave it at that.
re: and financially stripped bare.
Please refrain from using the ‘bare’ with reference to this woman. It takes me two hours of humming “It’s A Small World After All” to get the images out of my mind. I’m weak and my mind immediately skips to the worst possible visions of whatever I read, see or hear.
You mean like having a picture of your boss with his favorite hen ?? I agree , this Att. Gen and Justice dept. is in the tank .
The timing of the imposition of the “wall” fits, doesn’t it? If this had been a policy position of the Clinton DOJ, why wouldn’t it have been put in place in 1993, say following the first WTC bombing, which was dealt with as a law enforcement issue?
Conservancy Buys Large Slice of Adirondack Land There are some intersesting links at comment# 1 & 24.
Palin, the Base, and the Northeast Corridor Conservatives
North Korea Tests Engine of Long-Range Missile, Report Says (Are West coast cities threatened?)
Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign and military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.
Thanks for the ping.
the real reason the wall was put in place was to cover up the flow of foreign money in the 1995-96 campaign cycle to the Democrats.....So was Freddy Mac, Fanny Mae and the rest of the Democrat fundraiser schemes.
ping
The Wall was constructed by Gorelick to protect clinton from the ongoing investigations into his own malfeasance.
While its probably true that she was appointed to Fannie Mae as a reward, it wasnt for the 911 commission. She was on the board before 911 happened. It was probably a reward for protecting Clinton with the wall......Ding, Ding, Ding. All the DNC foreign donations were to be covered up, not investigated and relegated to the hole of obscurity. Remember no legal controlling authority?
Gorelick: evil conniving mistress of satan
Well, didn't Ms. Jamie earn a big payday by serving on the 9/11 Commission...failing to call herself as a witness and otherwise shoveling $hit in the federal mushroom farm?
The Clintons wanted her to be well-paid, after all.
The destruction of Freddie and Fannie was timed well. Either they’d be a panic and Bush would give them what they wanted, or Freddie and Fannie could be used to take down a Republican. Sarah changed the equation... she and McCain became the changers who would throw out corruption. This will get interesting.
Ping!
Do not let any unwholesome talk come out of your mouths, but only what is helpful for building others up according to their needs, that it may benefit those who listen.- Ephesians 4:29
Thanks very much for the ping, neverdem.
Jamie Gorelick is in the 1st deck of cards of domestic enemy women in the USA in my mind. She ranks right up there with Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi.
Outstanding thread. Thanks to all linkers/researchers/educators/posters.
Do “independents” need ANOTHER EXAMPLE of The Democrat Crime Syndicate? How much damage can one criminal do and go unscathed? She has to rank near the top in the history of this country.
Thanks to all like-minded lurkers reading this thread.
A look back at SOME of her damage discussed on this thread...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1120317/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.