Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: seastay; fieldmarshaldj

Do a search, someone corrected many of those claims.

Try this (post 9): http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2082686/replies?c=1


5 posted on 09/18/2008 9:54:11 PM PDT by ansel12 (There will be more than one "October surprise" this time. Count on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

Actually, he verified many of the claims, too. And a few of his “corrections” actually agreed with the contentions.


11 posted on 09/18/2008 10:06:32 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ansel12

how about this claim “ Over the past 50 years, the eight cities listed above have had Republican leadership for a combined 36 years. The rest of the time — a combined 364 years — they’ve been led by Democrats. “

the ratio is about 10%, time the crime cities are run by Republicans as the claim states. Does it make much difference if the real umber is 15% or 12%? Typical lib arguments will say if there is one flaw then all the data is bad,,, but as an approximation, the claims have the order of magnitude and correlation correct , yes, ?


17 posted on 09/18/2008 10:41:21 PM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson