Books I hated in high school but now appreciate:
1. 1984
2. Animal Farm
3. Brave New World.
All three of these sensitized and prepared me for modern-day liberalism.
Beat ya by 0.000001 of a second!
And I think I read it twice -- read it in college to see if it still sucked.
I really don't remember "Catcher in the Rye".
I hated that book as well. I'm not sure why that story appeals to so-called "intellectuals.". Do they glory in stories about futile angst? Does it make them feel superior?
You know it's bad when it's been made into a movie no fewer than FIVE TIMES.
I read at least 5 out of 6 of those, GOP.
After trying to read The Iliad and finding it unnecessarily confusing (too many nicknames that made no sense), I had to get a watered down version to get anything out of it, plus Cliff’s Notes. Same with The Odyssey.
The most overrated book I ever read is Moby Dick. If not for a two week teacher strike, I don’t think I could have done anything but use Cliff’s Notes. My teacher (who died late last year, rest his soul, and who had been run out of Birmingham by none other than Bull Connor) was great when school returned. He was extremely impressed that I had made the effort to read Moby Dick during the strike. Almost no one else bothered. He gave me the grade book to fill in zeros for many of the rest of the class. I declined that offer.
Actually, it's much worse than that. It's an American version of socrealist art, or agitprop. Steinbeck was a Stalin sympathizer. John Gardner has a devastating (non political) analysis of it in one of his manuals on fiction writing. It is propagandistic trash from beginning to end.
When I was in high school in the late 1960's, " young adult" books such as Catcher in the Rye and The Outsiders weren't assigned in English classes, as they are today, but many of my fellow students read them on their own. However, having some rather odd literary tastes for a teenager, I read books such as:
Death of a Salesman isn't so pointless if you're a leftie like its author, Arthur Miller, but some conservatives also like it.
I did have to read Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath in an English class, and I agree that it was overly depressing. I especially didn't care for its anti-conservative and anti-free enterprise bias. However, if it has stimulated in you an interest in the Okie diaspora in California, you might like Rising in the West: The True Story of an "Okie" Family from the Great Depression Through the Reagan Years by Dan Morgan (Dutton, 1992), a non-fiction story that provides a much more sophisticated and accurate portrayal of the Okie subculture tnan does Steinbeck's opus.
How about Miss Lonely Hearts.
ping
“High school books I was forced to read, and still think are stupid in my adulthood:
1. Catcher In The Rye. Dumb. “— I never identified with Holden Caulfield
“2. Death of a Salesman. Pointless. “Ditto
“3. Grapes of Wrath. Depressing and pointless.” Haven't read it, but have read Cannery Row and Tortilla Flat. Both are entertaining, but end on a down note.
“Books I hated in high school but now appreciate:
1. 1984 “ I found it the most depressing book I have ever read. Very valuable, when you realize he was depicting Soviet Russia.
“2. Animal Farm “ Another depressing book, in a more humorous vein. Again, the Russian Revolution in parable form.
“3. Brave New World. “ Extremely prescient, anticipating modern society and science.
I can't see the point of a “don't read” list. If the book's premise is crummy, or its writing is crummy, don't finish it.