To: LSUfan
Here’s an idea. Go back to having more than one type of infantry weapon/chambering, so that people fighting door to door and people fighting on the North German Plain don’t have to compromise. And give up on the principal of wounding the enemy. Our enemies are dirt bags and don’t slow down to help their wounded.
31 posted on
09/17/2008 9:22:16 AM PDT by
SampleMan
(Community Organizer: What liberals do when they run out of college, before they run out of Marxism.)
To: SampleMan
Heres an idea. Go back to having more than one type of infantry weapon/chambering, so that people fighting door to door and people fighting on the North German Plain dont have to compromise. And give up on the principal of wounding the enemy. Our enemies are dirt bags and dont slow down to help their wounded. Our enemies are more likely to leave their wounded to be a drain on OUR medical infrastructure, than to provide them with decent care.
I also agree with you on abandoning our "one size fits all" mentality, even if it does complicate logistics.
56 posted on
09/17/2008 10:20:16 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson