Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop; tet68; Quix; del4hope; B4Ranch; Smokin' Joe; TigersEye; EternalVigilance; ...

Pinging for additional commentary.


2 posted on 09/16/2008 3:48:41 PM PDT by joanie-f (If you believe that God is your co-pilot, it might be time to switch seats ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: joanie-f
I thought I knew all the dirt there was to know about this guy. We have to shout this from the roof tops!!!!!

Top notch research, Joanie!

25 posted on 09/16/2008 8:17:23 PM PDT by Minuteman23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: joanie-f; eeevil conservative; HonestConservative; All
Joanie - this is indeed a masterful dissertation on some of the egregious problems our country is facing. Unfortunately, I very much doubt that there will be any real improvement without either a revolution (which will not happen) or Congressional action (which also will never happen) or a Constitutional Amendment.

The back story on this --the PACs, the Lobbyists, Ike's 'Military-Industrial Complex', and most other nefarious group involvements with our government and especially Congress, is the illegal and non-legal and non-binding statement added to a case, where the Court Reporter noted in the First Sentence of the Syllabus:

He adapted that from the following, which was not in the Decision made by the Court, but in instructions given to the parties prior to the Oral Argument and Legal Presentations before the bench:

Reference: SANTA CLARA COUNTY V. SOUTHERN PACIFIC R. CO., 118 U. S. 394 (1886) - United States Supreme Court

 

I'm fairly certain that all cases before any Court have detailed commentary providing for limitation of the arguments to be presented, to ensure that the specific details are presented in a comprehensive, cogent, manner, and to prevent moving too far afield in the legal precepts necessary for the case at hand.

Lesser Courts and the USSC itself have used that illegal statement to run roughshod over the restrictions in the Constitution, thereby allowing the debacles we find ourselves in today.

Neither the USSC nor Congress has any intention of revising this illegal record, making this government illegal.

35 posted on 09/16/2008 9:09:44 PM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: joanie-f

BLOAT


75 posted on 09/17/2008 3:52:42 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson