It’s page three, but hey, I got quoted in the news paper. ~_~
YAY!
PS. Keep up the good fight Ferdinand! You are innocent and that I had no doubt of. The paper does fail to mention that all of the jury was in agreement that he didn’t “knowingly” have a gun in his back pack. What they were confused on was the definition of “knowingly”! Go figure!
One lady wanted to convict simply because he “had a gun”.
You can thank the Prosecution for that, who argued that... once you know something, you will always know it.
Tell that to my algebra teacher... I couldn’t do algebra now if there was a gun to my head. And I’m not sure but I think I got an “A” or “B” in algebra.
There was zero evidence that he knew he had the gun when he walked up to FAA with metal detecting equipment. One FAA witness said that he would have detected a gun, 100% of the time.