>Not only the magazine but other professional photographers are slamming Greenberg.<
As they should. When a politician or anyone who is in the public eye sits for a photographer, they are trusting that individual. Greenberg boasts she was able to get those shots, in essence photographically raping McCain, because he and his staff were too unsophisticated not to know she was tweaking her lights. In other words, McCain was too unsophisticated in trusting a person posing as a professional. What a bitch.
In the future, there will most likely be pressure and suspicion put on all professional photographers because Greenberg is an immature, unprofessional, downright nasty leftist.
I want to say this properly, not have it misunderstood -- the part that makes this whole thing so stoopid is that it was totally unnecessary to use bad lighting, trickery to make McCain look old, harsh if you will. He's not a young man, he's not as photogenic as he once was, SO? Those of us who will be voting for him will do so based on substance and character, not on superficiality. What he stands for, not what he looks like.
She tried to make him look hard and evil ... anyone who is a thinking, reasoning person can see the distortion, the phoniness of that picture. As with the campaign ad mocking McCain's disability due to war injury, these photos are targeted toward voters who are in the 0bama camp anyway, all they do is offend, tick off people for whom they WANT votes, ie., older voters. Good move, that.
And 0bama says he's qualified to be president because he has experience running this campaign. Oh, this helps, this is making the case for you, Barry. [/sarc]
I agree. When this is all said and done, how are we going to get payback on her?