I hope you’re correct, but there are some stories that I don’t see penetrating the media static, and this is one of them.
Well I hope I’m right, too! :^)
But I agree that “media static” is a big obstacle to getting this info the proper hearing it deserves..... and also several other possible factors, from likely bald-faced lies about it from the Obama campaign to the need for much more substantiation than simply one article.
That’s why I put a question mark about the possible effect on the election, and I said it “should” be over but of course Democrats can survive all sorts of outrageous behavior.
Still, this has the potential to be a blockbuster piece of ammo in any of the debates, assuming it can be nailed down firmly before then.