To: hsalaw
Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of US troops Nope. No constitutional provision for that, Sen. Obama.
197 posted on
09/15/2008 5:44:38 AM PDT by
Tennessean4Bush
(An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
To: Tennessean4Bush
And you think Obama cares about what’s constitutional or not. Look at Bolivia and Venezuela to see how Leftist Extremists can shred, ignore or change a constitution of a country.
206 posted on
09/15/2008 5:52:09 AM PDT by
Roamin53
(Islamists kill more people each year in the name of religion than the Inquisition did in 350 years!)
To: Tennessean4Bush
Obama: Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of US troops. Nope. No constitutional provision for that, Sen. Obama.
Obama: The constitution means what I say it means - it all depends on who is in control [ala the Cheshire Cat].
To: Tennessean4Bush
" Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of US troops "
" Nope. No constitutional provision for that, Sen. Obama."
Obama : " what US Constitution ? this is for the citizens of the world.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson