Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democratic activists should stop digging (some barf included)
Financial Times ^ | September 14, 2008 | by Clive Crook

Posted on 09/14/2008 1:54:47 PM PDT by library user

If Barack Obama loses this election to John McCain – something which, for the first time, I regard as a real possibility – history will point to August 29 as the pivotal moment. That was when Mr McCain announced that Sarah Palin would be his running-mate, and when livid Democrats and their friends in the media voiced their feelings about her and much of the electorate, and gravely harmed their candidate’s prospects.

For Mr McCain to win the election against the odds that faced him pre-Palin – with the economy in the tank and the incumbent Republican president setting records for unpopularity – would be sensational enough. For this to happen because of his vice-presidential pick, a decision that is usually of next to no consequence, beggars belief. The Democrats had to bring all their resources to getting themselves into this fix. They proved equal to the task.

As I argued last week, Mr Obama’s own initial reaction to the Palin nomination was exactly right. All the party had to do was follow his lead. Mr Obama, in effect, would give her enough rope; her inadequacies would reveal themselves in due course; it cost nothing, in the meantime, to be courteous, and to keep pressing on the issues, where the Democrats still enjoy an advantage with most voters. Ms Palin’s first television interview last week, an adequate but far from stellar performance, affirmed the wisdom of that course.

But the Democratic talking-heads had to exult in their disdain for Ms Palin and all she represents – namely, a good part of the electorate whose support Mr Obama needs. In the space of a few days, they irreversibly damaged Mr Obama’s candidacy and transformed this election.

Subsequent developments reflect poorly on both parties, in my view. Are the Democrats learning, and trying to correct their error? No, for the most part, just the opposite. Are the Republicans pressing their advantage with a confident, principled campaign focused on the issues that matter? Again, no.

Certainly, the Democrats can see they are in a hole. Somehow, though, the word has gone out: “Keep digging.” Mr Obama is also urged to be less cool and lose his temper. Voters adore an angry candidate, you see. “Dig faster, and be more angry,” is the advice coming down from the political geniuses who decided it was a fine idea to laugh at Ms Palin in the first place. A recurring television image in the past few days has been the split-screen contrast between a serenely smiling Republican operative and a fulminating red-faced Democrat about to have a stroke.

Efforts to smear the governor proceed at a frantic pace. My guess would be that there are now more journalists on assignment in Alaska than bothered to turn up for the Republican convention in St Paul, sifting through dustbins, interrogating Palin family acquaintances (extra credit for those with a grievance) and subjecting Ms Palin’s expenses claims to a fanatical scrutiny which I dare say their own record-keeping, or that of most senators, might not withstand.

Of course, they will find things. They may even find something important. But the sheer swarming zeal for trivial malfeasance and family embarrassments is rapidly raising the bar for impropriety. I think that many voters – and not just committed Republicans – find this whole spectacle disgusting, so on top of everything else Ms Palin is now getting a sympathy vote.

Among seasoned Democratic politicians, the picture is more mixed. Joe Biden, the vice-presidential nominee, appears to get it. His stump speech has started to include obliging remarks about Ms Palin, which suggests he is approaching the forthcoming television debate in the correct frame of mind. If he can stay polite and respectful while laying bare the gaps in Ms Palin’s knowledge and experience, and by highlighting her positions on social issues, which are unappealing to many centrists, he can undo some of the damage of recent days.

But compare this with the comment of Carol Fowler, chairman of the South Carolina Democratic party, who said late last week that Ms Palin’s main qualification for office was that she has not had an abortion. Brilliant! Even now, with the polls giving their verdict, there is much more like that. And Democrats wonder why they cannot get the debate back on to their issues.

Republicans are not going to help them do it while things are going so well for them. This may be understandable, but let us be clear – this is not to their credit. If Mr McCain were the kind of leader he claims to be, he would want to be elected for his platform. His policy proposals, not his vapid commitment to “change Washington”, would be to the fore. More than this, he would also want to bind the country together, and restore its moral strength and sense of purpose. He would strive to be a unifier. Mr Obama makes that claim, with seeming sincerity, and it is the best thing about his candidacy.

Democrats will deny it, but they opened this new front in the culture war by their response to the Palin nomination. The mess they are in is their own fault. They still seem intent on driving significant numbers of women and moderates over to the other side and Mr McCain’s political instinct is doubtless to help this rift in the electorate widen further. It could be a winning strategy. But good politics is not the same thing as responsible leadership. I intend it as a compliment to Mr McCain when I say that if his means to victory in this election is to divide the country, it is a victory he should not want.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: activists; democrats; digging; electionpresident; mccainpalin; obamabiden; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
I intend it as a compliment to Mr McCain when I say that if his means to victory in this election is to divide the country, it is a victory he should not want.

Now there's a new one.

1 posted on 09/14/2008 1:55:14 PM PDT by library user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: library user
Republican president setting records for unpopularity

No, he is not - Congress with its single digit approval beats him squarely.
2 posted on 09/14/2008 1:59:33 PM PDT by alecqss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user
I intend it as a compliment to Mr McCain when I say that if his means to victory in this election is to divide the country, it is a victory he should not want.

He spends the whole essay talking about how the Democrats are screwing up, and then seems to conclude that it's McCain's fault.

3 posted on 09/14/2008 2:00:54 PM PDT by krb (If you're not outraged, people probably like having you around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user
They still seem intent on driving significant numbers of women and moderates over to the other side and Mr McCain’s political instinct is doubtless to help this rift in the electorate widen further.

Heh, heh. And the cool thing about it is, it took a Conservative to create the atmosphere in which Moderates and Independents could see the RATS true colors.

If McCain had picked a Moderate or Liberal woman like Christine Todd Whitman or Elizabeth Dole, the Conservative base would've been demoralized instead of inspired and the media would rub that in our faces from now till doomsday. Which until a couple of weeks ago would've occurred on Nov. 4, 2008.

Now, instead, Doomsday has been turned into Independence Day, Jr.

4 posted on 09/14/2008 2:04:27 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (What do Barack Obama and a bowl of chili have in common?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user
For the first time, the MSM is admitting their candidate could well lose. Nothing they've done to reverse his slide in the polls has helped. They're desperate.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

5 posted on 09/14/2008 2:05:14 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user

“Mr McCain when I say that if his means to victory in this election is to divide the country, it is a victory he should not want. “

There is no common ground between left and right. McCain needs just enough votes to not be accused of cheating.

The repulsive response of the left to Palin illuminates the elitist, snarling fangs of the cultural left. Bitter, clingers get it. Obamachev is looking at a McGovern style defeat.


6 posted on 09/14/2008 2:06:48 PM PDT by y6162 (uot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead; justiceseeker93; Norman Bates

You were right when you predicted that the media’s unreleting harassment of Sarah Palin would backfire with the voters. And this liberal columnist is pointing it out, as well.


7 posted on 09/14/2008 2:06:56 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (If Islam conquers the world, the Earth will be at peace because the human race will be killed off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krb

0be has jumped off the pedestal of the post-partisan uniter and now has developed a penchant for showing the proverbial finger to as much of America as possible.


8 posted on 09/14/2008 2:09:05 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Palin for President! (PUMA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: library user
The Democrats just don't get it, IT.

Even when the media seems to grasp the severity of their divisive ignorance they still have to find a fall guy, McCain to take theat for their malfeasance at politics.

9 posted on 09/14/2008 2:10:48 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (The Difference Between Palin and Obama is Common Sense, She's GOT IT, He DOESN'T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user

“if his means to victory in this election is to divide the country, it is a victory he should not want.”

It’s the Democrats and their shills in the media who are dividing the country.


10 posted on 09/14/2008 2:11:59 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (If Islam conquers the world, the Earth will be at peace because the human race will be killed off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: library user
I intend it as a compliment to Mr McCain when I say that if his means to victory in this election is to divide the country, it is a victory he should not want.

An obvious lie. What Bozo ignores is that the press doesn't cover McCain when he talks about the issues. A great thing about Palin is they are so obsessed with her that they cover EVERYTHING about her. Besides, you'd have to be a political idiot to change course when everythings falling your way.

11 posted on 09/14/2008 2:11:59 PM PDT by shteebo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
And the cool thing about it is, it took a Conservative to create the atmosphere in which Moderates and Independents could see the RATS true colors.

Wasn't it the media, in all its intellectual glory, urging McCain to be bold and reach across the aisle and pick Lieberman?

It shows you the TRUE agenda of the media.

12 posted on 09/14/2008 2:12:01 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC

Even when the media seems to grasp the severity of their divisive ignorance they still have to find a fall guy, McCain to take theat for their malfeasance at politics.

Correction should read, McCain to take the heat for their malfeasance at politics.


13 posted on 09/14/2008 2:13:49 PM PDT by OKIEDOC (The Difference Between Palin and Obama is Common Sense, She's GOT IT, He DOESN'T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
You were right

I was? Thanks! :)
14 posted on 09/14/2008 2:15:31 PM PDT by Norman Bates (Freepmail me to be part of the McCain List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: krb
He seems to suggest that the fair thing to do would be for the grownups (read Republicans) to simply cease and desist concede the election over to them. Today.
15 posted on 09/14/2008 2:19:21 PM PDT by ArmyTeach (speak true, right wrong, follow the King)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: library user
I intend it as a compliment to Mr McCain when I say that if his means to victory in this election is to divide the country, it is a victory he should not want.

Sure it is. When your opponent is showing his true and ugly colors, you get out of their way and let them destroy themselves.

Being friends with marxist and the anti-American crowd that is left in his party is a total wast of time. Getting down to the truth of his values can wait until he is finished blowing up his campaign, you know those last few weeks right before the vote.

16 posted on 09/14/2008 2:19:31 PM PDT by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

0be has jumped off the pedestal of the post-partisan uniter and now has developed a penchant for showing the proverbial finger to as much of America as possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I think he is a hair’s breadth away from jumping up and down and shouting,”If you people don’t have sense enough to elect me I am going to go home and quit and you can just suffer with McCain as your president”.


17 posted on 09/14/2008 2:23:44 PM PDT by RipSawyer (What's black and white and red all over? Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

It shows you the TRUE agenda of the media.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Possibly the most hilarious thing about it all is that the media and the Democrats picked McCain as the Republican candidate, they kept saying McCain would be the Republican the Democrats would hate to run agianst, the only one who might beat Hillary. Now look, Hillary is out and McCain is outpolling Obama because he picked a conservative woman as his VP. It is poetic justice. They must be banging their heads and saying,”Why did we push them to nominate McCain?”


18 posted on 09/14/2008 2:31:28 PM PDT by RipSawyer (What's black and white and red all over? Barack Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: library user

Cut the jive, Clive!! Both McCain and Palin have gone out on the stump and outlined for voters exactly what they are going to do for this country. Can’t exactly say the same for Obambi, now, can you? Many voters just don’t know, beyond the “hopey-changey” thing, that is.


19 posted on 09/14/2008 7:28:11 PM PDT by Theresawithanh (I've got the fevah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alecqss

Harry Truman, a democrat had numbers in the 20’s after he fired McArthur.


20 posted on 09/14/2008 7:54:06 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson