Posted on 09/13/2008 8:48:08 PM PDT by chuknchez
That date would be fitting.
I’m guessing it’s pronounced “Ploof”.
It’s excellent to see such quick response by the McCain team, to the lies put out by Obama’s folks.
I agree completely. Neither he, nor Biden will be able to stop themselves.
Whats ironic about the Globe article and many articles written in 1999-2000 is that they are supportive of McCain and are generally written fairly. McCain was the media darling in 2000 when he was running against Bush. It was ,after all, the press that gave him the maverick label, one that they hold in disdain today.
Whats interesting is going back to read the articles written by the NYT, WaPo that they have tried to shove down a memory hole...what hypocrites they are.
It would make a great ad...though the feminists will be sniffing that Cindy McCain has been reduced to being 'just a secretary'...LOL, most of us wives would find it endearing and realistic--we do the same at home for our husbands, too!
Come to think of it, radical feminists do not know how the rest of womankind lives and how much our husbands depend on us. But then they don't have husbands. LOL
This was supposed to be Clinton's year. A run by Obama this time would have put him in the best position for a 2012 or 2016 campaign.
Think how many Senators run in each election cycle and how few get the nomination and you can see how unlikely it was that Obama would become the nominee his first time out.
Having been nominated, Obama's in over his head. He doesn't have the record, or the skills, or the team to take him the rest of the way.
You make an excellent point. Sin rules their lives, and they have the nerve to call us hypocrites and intolerant. Okay. Yay for them, I suppose.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.