1 posted on
09/13/2008 2:01:55 PM PDT by
nhwingut
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: nhwingut
Post much? It’s really very easy once you learn a few simple principles.
54 posted on
09/13/2008 2:31:21 PM PDT by
Minn
(Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
To: nhwingut
So they are actually calling the United States population Dimwatts?
To: nhwingut
I've gotten the scary feeling, for the first time in my life, that dimwittedness is not just on the march in the U.S., but that it might actually prevail.
Wrong. This is the third time in recent memory that arrogant, elitist liberal eggheads have tried to sway the American voting populace by suggesting that a vote for the Republican candidate equals a lack of intelligence.
This is the last refuge of a losing side. The leftists cannot win on the issues, cannot transform their tin-can candidate into gold and never could muster the maturity to be respectful with those they do not agree with politically. So like toddlers, they insult.
It worked so well for them in 2000 and 2004, didn't it? The very definition of insanity.
58 posted on
09/13/2008 2:35:18 PM PDT by
LostInBayport
(John McCain is the Luckiest Man Alive...mere mortals such as we can only wonder why...)
To: nhwingut
She's not readyShe's more ready than "Barack Obama", and, as such, she is a deadly virus eating away at the Democratic ticket.
EVERY TIME they bring up how ready, or not, she is, people get a mental image of the community organizer voting "present", and deciding to run for President after five minutes in the Senate.
Sarah Palin is a neutron bomb to the Obama campaign. Something's gotta give.
I thought it would be Biden, but now I'm wondering if little Barry can go the distance.
59 posted on
09/13/2008 2:35:55 PM PDT by
Jim Noble
(When He rolls up His sleeves, He ain't just puttin' on the Ritz)
To: nhwingut
The Bush Doctrine:
If I, as President, know a bunch of terrorists are plotting to cause thousands of US citizens to be killed and hundreds of billions of dollars in damages to a US city, would I target them if they were residing in a foreign country who don't care. Is that what you mean Charlie?
I would hope the answer would be yes. Apparently the liberals are aghast at this philosophy. They really do not care two hoots for 9/11.
60 posted on
09/13/2008 2:37:02 PM PDT by
HarleyD
To: nhwingut
![](http://eyeball-series.org/hacker/pict132.jpg)
Am I the only one who sees the resemblance between Diana Prince (Wonder Woman) and Sarah Palin?
63 posted on
09/13/2008 3:01:42 PM PDT by
Radix
(If Alaska were to secede from the Union it would probably become a power player in OPEC)
To: nhwingut
Well, in one week the VP candidate asked a guy in a wheel chair to stand up, and said others would have been a better VP choice. Nor, is this an aberration. Previously, the candidate had been caught plagiarizing on more than one occasion. The candidate even wanted to partition Iraq in a way that would have strengthened Iran, and led to a Kurdish rebellion in Turkey. Now that’s dim. Now, that’s why we call him Slow Joe.
To: nhwingut
Perhaps if Charlie Gibson shared his internet browsing it could clear things up a bit. He has revealed he gives credence to the leftist blogs.
To: nhwingut
The only weapon the left has is pure ridicule. The NY Times has the audacity to call anything simple minded? Do they read their own garbage? I guess when you live in your own little elite world where only elite dirt bags like this author are allowed to speak this is the what you get. I wonder if he even read the whole transrcipt of the interview LOL. We know what the answer to that is.
68 posted on
09/13/2008 3:40:41 PM PDT by
Archon of the East
(Universal Executive Power of the Law of Nature)
To: nhwingut
They call us these names and then wonder why we don't love and adore them. And they think we're clueless.
69 posted on
09/13/2008 4:31:23 PM PDT by
Reaganesque
(Vote: mccain/PALIN 2008!!)
To: nhwingut
The fact that Bob Herbert has been allowed to write a prominent column for the NYT these many years proves that dimwittedness has prevailed far too long. The Palin candidacy is merely an attempt to improve the nation’s political IQ.
To: nhwingut
Can anyone offer any explanation for why the dumbest people would vote for the same candidates as the brightest, with those in between voting for someone else? Does that really make sense, if the “brightest” have the same motives as everyone else?
73 posted on
09/13/2008 9:26:00 PM PDT by
supercat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson