If the title of this article is the original, somebody tell me why the writer chose to use McCain’s name in the title instead of Clinton’s? Sounds to me like clinton was in on a larger scale.
I had noticed that also ...
" ... the charismatic Follieri, whom Vanity Fair has likened to an ambitious nineteenth-century protagonist from a Balzac novel, ingratiated himself to President Clinton and aides by posing as a mega-donor to the Clinton Global Initiative. He also formed an investment partnership with California business mogul and Clinton donor Ron Burkle to develop surplus real estate properties owned by the Catholic Church, which Follieri claimed to represent ..."
It certainly wouldn't be because The Nation is in the socialists tank? ... no that couldn't be. lol
Oh ... and the title is original.