Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: montag813
The ad is totally misleading (naturally).

The Alaska predator cull is necessary to preserve the wildlife populations — of both predator and prey. Past culls (in northern Canada, as well as Alaska) have resulted in dramatically increased prey populations — and, in turn, larger predator populations.

If the “Defenders of Wildlife”, the wildlife would face declining numbers — possibly wiping out certain prey populations. The predators would then face slow death by starvation. With “defenders” like those, the wildlife doesn't need enemies.

32 posted on 09/12/2008 10:37:55 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

“If the “Defenders of Wildlife”, the ....”

That should be: “If the “Defenders of Wildlife” had their way, the ....”


37 posted on 09/12/2008 10:40:38 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA
With “defenders” like those, the wildlife doesn't need enemies.

Witness the disaster that is game "management" by "natural regulation" in Yellowstone National Park.

58 posted on 09/12/2008 12:34:08 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The fourth estate is the fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson