I only pinged you to that reply because I wanted to put Andrew’s encyclopedic knowledge of everyone’s comments on this thread to use. Forget it. I don’t want him to go off on some tangent.
Those aren't people "arguing" Constitutional Law, they are simply folks posting nonsense based on emotion, frustration, outright insanity, or the like. I never engage with them--I treat them as trolls and ignore them.
So, in the future, it would be appreciated if the thoughts of those misguided individuals not be attributed to those who are informed and have given a substantive basis for their positions and conclusions. Is that really asking too much?