Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob J; AndrewC
You know what I'm beginning to notice here? These people are not arguing with the government's case, they are arguing with the way they perceive the government's case was made in the media.

I'll give AndrewC some credit for returning to the transcript. His problem is that he rejects the jury's, the judge's, and the appeals court judges' reasoning and substitutes his own.

667 posted on 09/17/2008 6:02:40 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies ]


To: 1rudeboy; Ajnin
His problem is that he rejects the jury's, the judge's, and the appeals court judges' reasoning and substitutes his own.

It is called thinking for yourself. You might try it sometime.

670 posted on 09/17/2008 6:27:56 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies ]

To: 1rudeboy

It’s simpler than that. They think it should be legal to shoot SUSPECTED illegals on sight. That’s why they get their panties in a bunch over this, it conflicts with the basic wiring of their brain and they can’t handle it.


679 posted on 09/17/2008 9:41:55 AM PDT by Bob J (For every 1000 hacking at the branches of evil, one strikes at it's root.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson