Well, you certainly don't remember that it was not Ajnin [NOTE TO the rude one, the "NOT" modifies the noun "Ajnin"] who introduced the subject of reporting. It was introduced in post 40 with this statement First, both of them knew that it was their responsibility to file an incident report and furnish their supervisor with it. Not the other way around.
mjaneangels@aolcom responded to that and rudeboy, the munificent swillmerchant, responded with this gem ...Proof or STFU.
Then did Ajnin enter into the discussion about the reports.
And rudeone, your predicted tap dance about filing and verbal isn't going anywhere.
Except that, when I stated "some guy", I was referring to Ajnin. Which means that I clearly remember, and you are full of crap.
In any case, let me add the following for the record:
Ramos had been involved in an incident previously that involved him pulling his weapon and firing it. [ya don't say!] After that incident he wrote a report and was chastized for it because that report was not required or wanted by the supervisor. [oh really?] Ramos was told that the supervisor would have asked for a report if the supervisor wanted one. [of course]We have one Border Patrol agent left on this thread. He claims to be a policy expert. Perhaps he can direct us to the section of the regulations that states, "no need to report a weapons discharge if you've been told not to file a written report in the past?"181 posted on Friday, September 12, 2008 22:41:19 by mjaneangels@aolcom