[AndrewC]

You cannot chastize me for a comment I've made without recognizing the comment to which it was directed.

I sure can. You have yet to produce the Compean testimony. But I did reference the statement here..

The comment to which you responded was also responding to an "uninspired" comment by you about LEOs determining in advance a person's rights.

But if it stresses you so much, here is the intervening statement.

I presume your question to imply that you would prefer that we be invaded by a foreign nation and have not constitutional rights.

You stopped reading after presume.

[1rudeboy]

I presume your question to imply that you would prefer that we be invaded by a foreign nation and have not constitutional rights.

Ok, that was the comment that I gave the "dismissive" treatment? Can you see why? Or are you simply being obtuse?