[AndrewC]

Cold transcripts do not compare to actually being there watching people testify in person.

So what? What is the purpose of watching them testify? It surely is to ascertain their veracity. Well, that can be determined in this case by external evidence which cannot lie. A person can be uncomfortable under interrogation and still be telling the truth and a pathological liar can be confident in their lies, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman..." My mind is made up by the evidence, yours, apparently, is made up by the process.

[Ajnin]

You’re right evidence and documentation are good indicators of deciet or truth. Debra Kanof in pre trial motions lied her ass off. She told judge Cordone that Agents were not allowed to pursue fleeing suspects according to Border Patrol policy. Then lied again by stating that Agents don’t have Title 21 authority which gives them authority to make drug related arrests. Such blatant lies make it obvious that Debra Kanof was being malicious in her prosecution. There’s no need to look in a face at all.

[TKDietz]

No, I just have more important things to do than spend hours reading through testimony and arguing with you about nitpicky details of a case that has already been tried and appealed. I'm not getting sucked into that. I've been watching the argument on this thread and it is clear to me that you are someone who cannot be convinced to believe anything other than what you believe. I think the people that have been arguing with you on this thread have been kicking your butt. You've been losing and you can’ even see that. Why on earth would I want to waste my time arguing with someone like you?