Can you explain to me how thinking some states can allow murder of unborn children is “pro-life”?
Remembering your recent posting history to me, I expect only verbal abuse back from you in reply to this simple question.
I think, EV, that when many people think of states’ rights, at least from our side, in dealing with abortion, they are thinking about state regulations, and the state’s right to restrict abortion-something SCOTUS only recently has been upholding, and only in limited ways.
I agree with your assessment of states’ rights and how it is a governmental obligation to defend and protect innocent human life.
The states have no rights to vote for or order the murder of innocent human beings.
However, many people are beginning with the premise that SCOTUS has already usurped the states’ power to exercise its duties in this regard. They are trying to push back as best they can. While I agree with your belief that we all have a duty to do alot more than this, I think we also need to recognize where we are in this battle.
Let’s not disparage our own.
Yawn. Go take a basic civics course. Try layering on political science and basic logic. Semantics would be good too. Then come back and try again. That you can even try to claim that the most pro-life ticket the GOP has ever had is pro-abortion shows a serious derangement of fact and fiction in your synaptic process. Get help.