Even though pressured to abort her baby with down’s syndrome, she did not. I’d say she’s pro-life. Plus, the only exception she has is for the life of the mother.
She is also against EMBRYONIC stem cell research, unlike McCain.
If you want to point out flaws in her answer, fine. But to say she is not pro-life, and like McCain, is a stretch.
Hillary Clinton didn't kill Chelsea. Is that a "pro-life credential" now? Sheesh.
You should really stop, step back and think deeply about what you're arguing, because at its core, you're arguing from a pro-choice mindset.
Go back and read the transcript. She made it explicitly clear that her personal opinion means nothing, and that it is McCain's opinion that will be carried into policy.
In other words, her political capital is being expended to support the destruction of human embryos.
If you, and all the other conservatives who are now so hot to ride on the McCain/Palin bandwagon, would be truly honest with yourselves, you'd realize that yours is too. This is the practical reality.
It's not a stretch at all. It's a stretch to call someone who doesn't believe that our most fundamental God-given right, the right to life, belongs to all, "pro-life."
Does anyone even remember what the word "unalienable" even means any more? Have your brains turned to mush?
John McCain and Sarah Palin are no more pro-life than Stephen A. Douglas was anti-slavery.