Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: roamer_1; betty boop
[ The federal government has no right or authority over these unalienable rights, but is charged with their protection. ]

The federal gov't didn't grant Inalienable rights and therefore cannot protect them..
The federal government can ONLY alienate them..

328 posted on 09/15/2008 7:19:57 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]


To: hosepipe; betty boop
[roamer_1] The federal government has no right or authority over these unalienable rights, but is charged with their protection.

The federal gov't didn't grant Inalienable rights and therefore cannot protect them..
The federal government can ONLY alienate them..

It was the original states acting severally, IOW, federally, who endeavored to define a government which would protect those unalienable rights. The formation of that government was their singular purpose in uniting, and the protection of those unalienable rights was their foremost, and also the very heart of their agreement.

If this, the equal protection of unalienable rights under law (all men are endowed by their Creator), the very first cause of Union (federation), is not a federal issue, then there is no cause for federation at all.

334 posted on 09/16/2008 6:40:51 PM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson