[Tublecane]

All right, this toy is ridiculous, but what’s with the reference to protesters in New York. The victims of the raids conspired to carry out violations of violent crimes, both against people and property. Free speech and consent had nothing to do with it.

Can I go smash the window at the offices of “Reason” without reprecussion?

[Tublecane]

“but what’s with the reference to protesters in New York”

Damnit, I meant Minnesota. That is a particularly egregious error, seeming as how I live 30 minutes away from the Twin Cities.

Anyway, meticulously consistent libertarians annoy me. As Emerson said, foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds. “Reason”-able people can be so obtuse.

[Nathan Zachary]

"Can I go smash the window at the offices of “Reason” without reprecussion?"

You sure can! It all depends how good you are at not getting caught.

[AnotherUnixGeek]

All right, this toy is ridiculous

It's also dangerous. What is going on in this sheriff's county that he thinks he needs an armored military vehicle like this? A man who buys something like this obviously intends to use it - and it's hard to envision any normal police work that would require it. The photograph featuring deputies playing soldiers doesn't exactly inspire confidence either - this is a big mess waiting to happen.