Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PhilosopherStones

We need to be a bit smarter about this whole thing.

Sarah Palin did not ask Charlie for clarification because she did not know. She knew that the Bush doctrine is a loaded term. She shrewdly asked Charlie to unpack it. He of course would not because he wants to use the varied expectations of the term against Palin.

She proceeded with a differentiated answer that defended the principals of the policy without adhering to its specifics. That maintains the campaign image of change while not severely undermining the President.

It was quite shrewd on her part. The obvious game plan of Gibson and ABC was to cast her as a warmonger.

I think he failed to get that done effectively.


8 posted on 09/11/2008 7:48:57 PM PDT by lonestar67 (Its time to withdraw from the War on Bush-- your side is hopelessly lost in a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lonestar67

Absolutely correct (in my, somewhat biased, opinion).


11 posted on 09/11/2008 7:54:21 PM PDT by PhilosopherStones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: lonestar67
I think his goal was to get a sound bite the Dems could use. He failed on that account as well.
18 posted on 09/11/2008 8:02:40 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter ( Sarah Palin is America's Margaret Thatcher; Obama is America's George Galloway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson