After the ABC interview, she needs to read up on the Bush Doctrine.
“After the ABC interview, she needs to read up on the Bush Doctrine.”
She did fine on that. She refused the trap and made the question her own. She did it three times and he just gave up.
This is very aggressive questioning. They ask BO a question. He blurs around. So they move on and ask the next question.
Oddly, Gibson thought the “Bush Doctrine” was that we could attack before we were attacked.
But the Bush Doctrine first was that if you harbor terrorists, we would treat you like terrorists.
He changed that later. He also had several other “doctrines”.
She asked Gibson exactly what part of Bush’s doctrine he was asking about, and he refused to say.
But as soon as she answered, he knew EXACTLY what part he wanted to ask, and asked it.
Clearly he didn’t want an answer, he wanted to try to trip her up. And he failed miserably. Her answer was perfect.
Oddly, Gibson thought the “Bush Doctrine” was that we could attack before we were attacked.
But the Bush Doctrine first was that if you harbor terrorists, we would treat you like terrorists.
He changed that later. He also had several other “doctrines”.
She asked Gibson exactly what part of Bush’s doctrine he was asking about, and he refused to say.
But as soon as she answered, he knew EXACTLY what part he wanted to ask, and asked it.
Clearly he didn’t want an answer, he wanted to try to trip her up. And he failed miserably. Her answer was perfect.
Oddly, Gibson thought the “Bush Doctrine” was that we could attack before we were attacked.
But the Bush Doctrine first was that if you harbor terrorists, we would treat you like terrorists.
He changed that later. He also had several other “doctrines”.
She asked Gibson exactly what part of Bush’s doctrine he was asking about, and he refused to say.
But as soon as she answered, he knew EXACTLY what part he wanted to ask, and asked it.
Clearly he didn’t want an answer, he wanted to try to trip her up. And he failed miserably. Her answer was perfect.