Show me where I said that.
>>>>>> A better question would be, since so many darwinists keep parroting that ToE doesn’t address origins, then why do they get into such a snit every time ID DOES address origins?
I'm not "so many Darwininsts", and it's not a better question. You keep arguing about question. You keep arguing about "Darwinists". It looks like when you sit down at that keyboard to argue crationism vs. evolut8ion you assume your "opponent" collectively and monolithically. As far as you're concerned the person sitting at the other keyboard might as well be Richard Dawkins, and will get treated accordingly.
Also, everytime someone shows it to you, you make comments like “Well, I don’t go to creation sites...but I’m sure they’re nice people”!
Show me where I said I don't go to cretionist websites.
You’ll have to excuse the typos in that last post. I’m sharing the keyboard with a cat at the moment.
I’m not “so many Darwininsts”, and it’s not a better question. You keep arguing about question. You keep arguing about “Darwinists”. It looks like when you sit down at that keyboard to argue crationism vs. evolut8ion you assume your “opponent” collectively and monolithically. As far as you’re concerned the person sitting at the other keyboard might as well be Richard Dawkins, and will get treated accordingly.
>>>>>>>> The only thing I can tell you is projecting doesn’t constitute debate!
Show me where I said I don’t go to cretionist websites.
>>>>>>>
I’ve read creationist websites. I’m not reading another one right now.
If they’re scientists, and we’re leaving science to the scientists their “dissent” is between them and the other scientists.
#1220
Perhaps my better response would have been...
“let me know when you’re ready”?
Well, let me know when you’re ready!
Again, when I refer you to scientists, and you say you’re not going to read it...
I really don’t know how else to help you!