[so_real]

Are you submitting the it should not be allowed to, and how do you propose to stop it?

No. The line between science and religion is long withstanding. Being human, we do not have the tools or knowledge-base to build a wall between the two (not now, perhaps not ever). I submit only that I find the argument that evolutionary origins is "science" and not "dogma" to be intellectually dishonest, and that I grow weary of it -- but not so much that I'll stop pointing it out when I see it :-)

[tacticalogic]

I submit only that I find the argument that evolutionary origins is "science" and not "dogma" to be intellectually dishonest, and that I grow weary of it -- but not so much that I'll stop pointing it out when I see it :-)

I submit that you only find it to be dogma because it conflicts with your religious beliefs. If it didn't you wouldn't have any problem with it.