Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith

You could make a case from that statement, but if it takes three or four sentenses of explaining to get at what is being implied, it will not be a very effective attack. Besides, Obama parsed that statement before making it, so it would even be more difficult for the attack to stick.


109 posted on 09/11/2008 11:06:03 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: Always Right
it's just an interpretation, it proves nothing, But it is not "false"
This kind of attack cannot be open.

I doubt we'll find irrefutable proof they're doing this, it's like the pretty girls in car commercials, the happy children in the laundry commercials, etc: subliminal.
That is why McCain's campaign mmade such a big deal out of this incredibly, even unbelievably, silly issue- to blunt a defining of her in the electorate's subconscious.

110 posted on 09/11/2008 11:28:52 AM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson