Skip to comments.
SARAH PALIN'S SECURITY CLEARANCE
9/10/08
Posted on 09/10/2008 8:02:14 AM PDT by Fighter@heart
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: Fighter@heart
GOP governors in charge of both.
To: Fighter@heart
4
posted on
09/10/2008 8:08:29 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
(Maverick - Barracuda 2008)
To: Fighter@heart
She can be entrusted with our national security, because she already is.
Not sure that's a reason considering all the asshats in Washington that are entrusted with our national security and shouldn't be.
5
posted on
09/10/2008 8:08:38 AM PDT
by
RedCell
(Honor thy Father (9/6/07) - Semper Fi)
To: Fighter@heart
A prime target for SPETZNAZ commandos should hostilites develop.
6
posted on
09/10/2008 8:10:37 AM PDT
by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
To: Fighter@heart
7
posted on
09/10/2008 8:11:26 AM PDT
by
mnehring
(Maverick/Barracuda 2008)
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: Fighter@heart
9
posted on
09/10/2008 8:12:23 AM PDT
by
Artemis Webb
(Sarah Palin: Babies, Guns, Jesus. HOT DAMN!)
To: Fighter@heart
Where is the authority to support this information? It’s my understanding that state governors are not responsible for opeations involving missile interceptors. I’m a Palin supporter, but I’m not comfortable citing credentials for which I have no proof.
10
posted on
09/10/2008 8:16:15 AM PDT
by
Tidbit
(Shoot low boys, they're riding Shetland Ponies.)
To: George Smiley
Is she also a member of Supreme Headquarters Alien Defence Organization (SHADO). It is a control center hidden underground beneath a movie studio somewhere near London, England. /sarc
11
posted on
09/10/2008 8:16:25 AM PDT
by
LetsRok
To: Fighter@heart
To: Fighter@heart
“She can be entrusted with our national security, because she already is.”
The inference is that the other guys are not to be trusted or entrusted with national security because they haven’t keep secrets.
To make a good argument, you’ve gotta come up with better logic and evidence that that.
To: Artemis Webb; Fighter@heart
14
posted on
09/10/2008 8:19:05 AM PDT
by
Morgan in Denver
(Change is not two more lawyers in the White House)
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: Fighter@heart
I think the woman is great....but the word “MAY” appears to often in this piece that been floting around the WWW for days......
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: ajwharton
I didn’t know that YW was public until I applied for a job at Raytheon. It asked for current sec clearance and had YW as one of the options. LOL.
To: ajwharton
To: Per-Ling
I have a TS/SCI clearance and went through extensive “vetting.” I really don’t see how Obama could EVER get such a clearance with the associates he has. I known for D@MN sure I could not, if my past looked even HALF as sketchy as his. Yeah, that is an 18 month anal exam.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson