Posted on 09/09/2008 12:57:24 PM PDT by SmithL
Nothing beats 000 buckshot.
And I’m certain the dead perp was a “fine young man” and all that. Sorry he’s dead, but it seems as though he needed to be dead. Next!
And I’m certain the dead perp was a “fine young man” and all that. Sorry he’s dead, but it seems as though he needed to be dead. Next!
***A 19-year-old Sacramento man was shot and killed early this morning.....***
Another child is a victim of gun violence according to BRADY BUNCH calculations.
A) A lot of Rio Linda is a bad area.
B) We don’t have a castle law so I hope the guy said, a) I feared for my life and b) I looked through the peephole and saw they were armed. Otherwise, I’m afraid he’ll get charged. Anyone know for sure?
C) Instant Karma.
or as I like to call it, the best news ever!
or as I like to call it, the best news ever!
One of the men was carrying a rifle and trying to jam it through the door, which was slightly ajar,
That's enough for me.
One of the men was carrying a rifle and trying to jam it through the door, which was slightly ajar,
That's enough for me.
>>I’m concerned that this story might not have the happy ending I’d like it to. I don’t believe the PRC has a “Make My Day” law or castle doctrine.
You are correct. In Kali, one has a “duty to retreat” even in your own home. You have to be trapped, and in the process of being physically attacked with a weapon after being clearly notified by the bad guy of his intent before the state allows you to defend yourself.
Yes the site is slow but ya dont have to double post all the time, probably makes situation worse.
As the Junior Walker and the all stars song goes.......
I said....SHOTGUN!!!!! Shoot-Em for they run now!
Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ub5qqWCtmdw&feature=related
You know what Rush says about Rio Linda!
Au Contraire...
California Penal Code Section 197:
197. Homicide is also justifiable when committed by any person in
any of the following cases:
1. When resisting any attempt to murder any person, or to commit a
felony, or to do some great bodily injury upon any person; or,
2. When committed in defense of habitation, property, or person,
against one who manifestly intends or endeavors, by violence or
surprise, to commit a felony, or against one who manifestly intends
and endeavors, in a violent, riotous or tumultuous manner, to enter
the habitation of another for the purpose of offering violence to any
person therein; or,
3. When committed in the lawful defense of such person, or of a
wife or husband, parent, child, master, mistress, or servant of such
person, when there is reasonable ground to apprehend a design to
commit a felony or to do some great bodily injury, and imminent
danger of such design being accomplished; but such person, or the
person in whose behalf the defense was made, if he was the assailant
or engaged in mutual combat, must really and in good faith have
endeavored to decline any further struggle before the homicide was
committed; or,
4. When necessarily committed in attempting, by lawful ways and
means, to apprehend any person for any felony committed, or in
lawfully suppressing any riot, or in lawfully keeping and preserving
the peace.
That information is legally incorrect.
California has no such duty to retreat within your own home.
One less.
Looks like the shooter belives in gun control..He had total control of his gun when he shot the POS !! Good for him, we need more people in control of their guns.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.