Yesterday it was the "Palin wanted to censor the library" story ... the hideous headline of which also was contradicted by the article.
It'd be funny, were it not so damaging to civil discourse.
Well, yes, but the real point is that Obama voters only read the headline, and maybe the first paragraph. After that, their mind is made up, and they turn the page.
That is why they see the ‘facts’ differently than we do.
We actually read the whole thing.
OK. the first two paragraphs.
They skip the rest of the article, because it contains details which brings up things like facts, and proof, which is stupid stuff that only members of the VRWC care about, or believe.