Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dmz
The bride and groom did not want to be known as "Party A" and "Party B." I don't blame them.

By your reasoning, they should have just grabbed their ankles and given in to the leftists and their gay agenda.

5 posted on 09/09/2008 10:33:03 AM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: buccaneer81
The bride and groom did not want to be known as "Party A" and "Party B." I don't blame them. By your reasoning, they should have just grabbed their ankles and given in to the leftists and their gay agenda.

How many times, when signing a legal document, have you demanded the legal documents not refer to the parties as parties? What!!!!!????? Never? Shocking.

The pastor did not have to, nor did he, refer to them as Party A and Party B. So they were not ever going to be known as Party A / Party B.

That you think of anal sex in this context is more than a bit disturbing.

10 posted on 09/09/2008 11:04:20 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson