To: GodGunsGuts
Well since “Chuck Colson obviously believes that HIV causes AIDS” and you think that belief is all lies and myth, then Colson is part of the Aids lobby, isn't he? And the author and researchers he referenced are also.
Or is he one of those AIDS “alarmists” who argue from “pseudoscience”? As you called them.
In short Colson is arguing that contaminated medical equipment is the principal means of HIV transmission. The researchers also found evidence to the contrary.
48 posted on
09/08/2008 10:39:21 PM PDT by
count-your-change
(you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: count-your-change
Nope, I think Chuck Colson is a good guy. I agree with virtually every point made in his article, except for the assumption that HIV causes of AIDS. I see no evidence that I should blame him for not knowing about the other side. Indeed, there was a time when I championed the HIV/AIDS hypothesis. Luckily, I had friends in the scientific community who made me aware of the other side in the early days of the epidemic.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson