Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/08/2008 5:33:30 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bruinbirdman

What we really need is a BDS default.


2 posted on 09/08/2008 5:37:51 PM PDT by JennysCool (A man who served his country well vs. a walking Che poster. Is it really that tough a choice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Why aren’t the CEOs of Fannie and Freddie committing seppuku? Oh, yeah, gotta get Obama elected.


3 posted on 09/08/2008 5:38:04 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Is that really $62,000 Billion ___________ ?


4 posted on 09/08/2008 5:39:02 PM PDT by ex-Texan (Matthew 7: 1 - 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
That means that meeting any claims on CDS may not be that costly, although the details are still being worked out and the impact is unknown.

The headline kind of makes it sound more serious than this final sentence does.

5 posted on 09/08/2008 5:39:54 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NVDave
NVDave wrote on another thread last night:

"Is putting Fannie/Freddie into conservatorship going to trigger default swaps on the paper? Is the Treasury seizing control of the GSE’s considered a “credit event” that triggers the swaps?

If it does, I think that there’s going to be some more pain than the boys at Treasury think, and a whole lot more behind the scenes wrangling necessary to keep the debt markets from going ape than just this plan.

yitbos

6 posted on 09/08/2008 5:40:36 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." - Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

I cannot see how the government’s takeover of Fannie/Freddie is any better. Government always fails, everytime it is tried. Are these not the same people (Congress) who had oversight of Fannie/Freddie? Are these not the same people who urged Frannie/Freddie to back loans to borrowers who had bad credit and insufficient incomes to pay their mortgages? Are we nuts?


13 posted on 09/08/2008 6:36:29 PM PDT by caisson71 (Times change, values don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

I heard on Rush today that HUD back in the 90’s under Andrew Cuomo mandated that freddie and fannie had to make loans to low income households–ie high risk households. And this on top of the loans to low income neighborhoods (ie high risk loans) fostered by the Community Reinvestment Act 1979.

The CDO concept was developed by (convicted) Michael Milken of (now-defunct) Drexel Burnham Lambert. After the securities scandal, the vehicle lay dormant until picked up by the mortgage industry around 1999/2000. CSPAN aired an interview with a journalist who looked into the subject; took more than a few calls from some articulate folks who objected to placing the blame on Fannie/Freddie for exactly the reason I stated. The CDO package - courtesy of Mikey Milken - is flawed.


15 posted on 09/08/2008 6:58:59 PM PDT by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

This is what capitalism USA has come to. We don’t produce shit but we sure do know how to trade derivatives and other loony financial instruments (CDOs). We sure know how to flip illegal alien built houses. We sure know how to get Gubbermint agencies like Freddy Mac to demand by law more home loans for the poor and illegal immigrants

I liked the old robber barons and captaisn of industry. At lesat they got rich making useful trhings


19 posted on 09/09/2008 1:30:51 AM PDT by dennisw (Never bet on a false prophet! ::::::::::: Never bet on Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
Just the tip of the iceberg, folks. Greenspan's "imaginations" that were "created into place" have allowed the manipulation of the financial and commodities markets with imaginary monies.

The use of imaginary monies (heavy over leveraging) have been used through the years to cook the books so those at the top could skim their fat bonuses, i.e. real money.

Amazing the hoodwink allowed to basically bet the same money over and over again at the same time in different crap games and the shooter carrying a pair o loaded dice.

The depth of the level of the deceitful debt shell game is just now starting to show and peoples' retirement funds was the front monies laid at risk.

20 posted on 09/09/2008 2:16:46 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson