1 posted on
09/08/2008 5:18:04 PM PDT by
rhema
To: rhema
“but if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby. I don’t want them punished with an STD at the age of 16.”
What happened to cause and effect, wrong choices and logical consequences? To me, this is the fundamental problem with the left’s arguments.
2 posted on
09/08/2008 5:23:15 PM PDT by
RedBloodedTexan
(Great minds like a think.)
To: rhema
Obama was asked when “a baby gets human rights." He fudged: “Answering that question with specificity, you know, is above my pay grade." Let's keep it that way.
3 posted on
09/08/2008 5:25:53 PM PDT by
DrewsDad
(PIERCE the EARMARKS)
To: rhema
“The next president and vice president will be the most pro-choice in US history. Or the most pro-life.”
And it’s not likely to matter. The end of prenatal infanticide will come in this country. But not as a result of anything the politicians or judges do.
4 posted on
09/08/2008 5:26:42 PM PDT by
RKBA Democrat
(Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
To: rhema
Senator John McCain, long one of the Senate's reliably antiabortion votes, is a father of seven, including an adopted orphan from Bangladesh. I never knew this. I guess he didn't want to play that card.
5 posted on
09/08/2008 5:34:15 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(Obama?Bye-den!|Iran Azadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY)| The New WSJ Magazine is disgusting)
To: All
.
.
7 posted on
09/08/2008 5:36:22 PM PDT by
patriot08
To: rhema
indeed, should we win in 60 days I think we at least have a grand shot at vacating Roe...that is a great start and will reduce abortions a lot
10 posted on
09/08/2008 10:08:03 PM PDT by
wardaddy
(Obama/Pol Pot 2008)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson