Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ms. Palin's Pipeline
Washington Post ^ | Monday, September 8, 2008; A16

Posted on 09/08/2008 8:20:32 AM PDT by Perdogg

PEOPLE ARE still buzzing about Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin's acceptance speech. But while her style has been minutely analyzed, very little commentary has focused on one of the few substantive claims she made about her brief tenure as governor of Alaska: that she "fought to bring about the largest private-sector infrastructure project in North American history . . . a nearly $40 billion natural gas pipeline to help lead America to energy independence." Is Ms. Palin right about the importance of the pipeline and her role in moving it forward?

Ms. Palin is indeed correct about the need to tap the 35 trillion cubic feet of natural gas under Alaska's North Slope, the same region whose oil made the state wealthy but which has begun to run dry. Natural gas demand is growing rapidly in North America, and low-carbon natural gas is better for the environment than coal or petroleum. This means that the outlook for gas prices is relatively bullish, making the economics of an Alaska pipeline more favorable than ever before. Yet for decades the idea has been deadlocked by federal and state politics -- and unless the United States can install a pipeline to transport Alaska's gas soon, companies may commit to foreign sources of liquefied natural gas, thus locking in long-term dependency on imports.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: energy; mccainpalin; naturalgas; palin; pipeline

1 posted on 09/08/2008 8:20:32 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

ping


2 posted on 09/08/2008 8:22:53 AM PDT by Perdogg (Maverick - Barracuda 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Hades is freezing over. The WaPost published this?

“Perhaps her Democratic opponent for the governorship in 2006, who campaigned on similar ideas, would have achieved these results. Nevertheless, Ms. Palin actually did.”


3 posted on 09/08/2008 8:23:39 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Very little attention has been focused on her record because: a) the liberals are afraid of it because it destroys BOTH of their candidates, and; b) it speaks for itself.

BTW, Palin has only been governor for a couple of years... but I’ll be willing to bet that had she NOT been tapped for the VP role, she would be governor for many more.


4 posted on 09/08/2008 8:24:17 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
No wonder the best Obama can do to counter this is to have his supporters send unflattering photos of the Palin family all over the Internet.

What a child!

5 posted on 09/08/2008 8:28:25 AM PDT by pray4liberty (Stand up and pray up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson