[squidly]

Expose? Are they pushing the story that Sarah is claiming Bristol’s baby as her own? I don’t know what other expose there could be.

[jrooney]

"Are they pushing the story that Sarah is claiming Bristol’s baby as her own?"

Think you want to rephrase that? It is Sarah's baby and not Bristol's.

[davisfh]

No way that story can fly. Bristol is five months pregnant and the baby is around five months as I recall. What’s wrong with them? Can’t they do the math? Well, that was a dumb question wasn’t it? It’s obvious that they can’t.

[ThanhPhero]

Maybe they are going to “expose” the fact that she didn’t abort a downsyn child. That is actually a totally immoral and unforgivable act to the left. Add to that the act of permitting her daughter to not abort the premarital child and Sarah Palin is an utterly unspeakable person unit.

[lonestar]

Bristol would have had to be 7 months pregnant with Trig when she got preg with her "latest." LOL!

We have no competent reporting ...except sometimes from the National Enquirer.

[I see my hands]

"Are they pushing the story that Sarah is claiming Bristol’s baby as her own? "

If so SHP could hold up her son's birth certificate and ask, "Now may we see yours, Barack Obama?"

[oldbrowser]

Expose? Are they pushing the story that Sarah is claiming Bristol’s baby as her own? I don’t know what other expose there could be.

Maybe they are going to expose the Obama/DNC's involvement in the smear campaign to say that Trig is really the daughters baby?

[El Gato]

I don’t know what other expose there could be.

I can think of at least one other possibility. Which I will not even mention.