Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cookcounty

As an earlier poster said, its probably something about the baby not being Todd Palin’s baby.

I doubt the NYSlimes would put any story out there against their Messiah.


493 posted on 09/07/2008 5:31:01 PM PDT by bushsupporter30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies ]


To: bushsupporter30
"As an earlier poster said, its probably something about the baby not being Todd Palin’s baby."

Again, probably just a canard to open up the affair issue. Did the National Enquirer sell information to the NYT?

498 posted on 09/07/2008 5:32:52 PM PDT by Brian S. Fitzgerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies ]

To: bushsupporter30

Nope, that won’t do much to the ‘base’. I’m betting they’ll say that Sarah’s doctors gave her the abortion option, and she and her husband thought about it, and ultimately decided no. Its that ‘thinking about it’ that they’ll try to use to stir up the base.


502 posted on 09/07/2008 5:34:27 PM PDT by rintense (Palin 2012 for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 493 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson