To: nospin2244
Always “interesting” how this sort of sincere religious activity is so controversial to the left but forcing gay sex ed upon teenagers (or younger) is simply considered “educational” and non-controversial by the very same people.
20 posted on
09/07/2008 2:07:59 PM PDT by
Enchante
(If Bill Clinton could juggle 5 chicks and an angry wife then why worry about Sarah Palin?)
To: Enchante
indeed. they’r all for promoting and coverting people to the gay lifestyle, but no one beter try and convert those of the gay lifestyle... why it’s blasphemy!
To: Enchante
50 posted on
09/07/2008 2:20:54 PM PDT by
nobama08
To: Enchante
Always “interesting” how this sort of sincere religious activity is so controversial to the left but forcing gay sex ed upon teenagers (or younger) is simply considered “educational” and non-controversial by the very same people. Good point.
72 posted on
09/07/2008 2:44:30 PM PDT by
GOPJ
("Vegetarian" - Old Indian word for "bad hunter")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson