Posted on 09/07/2008 10:02:40 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
The San Francisco Chronicle published an article on September 7 masterful for its underhanded back slapping of John McCain, Sarah Palin and anyone who would vote for them all while pretending to say how successful the McCain/Palin ticket is in garnering support since the end of the GOP Convention. Nearly every "positive" thing said about Republicans and anyone who would vote for McCain was framed as a negative and the way this article states its case proves as one of the most perfectly sly pieces of pro-Democrat propaganda I've seen in a long time. It's so good that you don't even realize your being manipulated until you sit back and think about the piece as a whole.
In this story by Chronicle writer Carolyn Lochhead, the headline properly elicits curiosity enough to draw the reader in: "Palin may woo blue-collar voters from Obama" it reads intriguingly. But think about this header. The headline assumes from the start that "blue-collar voters" are Obama's to lose, that McCain doesn't have any to start with but has to "woo" Obama's. Negative strike against McCain number one. There are many more to come
So, how do we start an article about how John McCain will woo, or is wooing blue-collar voters? Do we start it by saying what McCain does that appeals to blue-collar voters? No, we start by quoting Democrats saying that McCain fails to appeal to blue-collar voters and that he is just like Bush. In a story that at first seems to be about John McCain's success the very first paragraph of the story is anti-John McCain. Strike number two....
Read the rest at Publiusforum.com...
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
The exegesis is not worth the effort.
Well-educated while male Liberals, meaning those that went to Ivy League schools?
If there has EVER BEEN a group of voters that not only are FOOLED, but allow themselves to be fooled in order to FEEL GOOD, it is the MINDLESS LIBERALS.
Major dupes. Now, pass the Kool-Aid bucket, Mr. Jones....
Look at the bright side. They can’t call us “sexists” anymore.
"These are folks that may have a problem with Obama," said Gerald Austin, a Democratic strategist who worked for Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland. "They may say it's his experience, but we know it's because of his race."
That's a keeper, right there.
The demos are the ones that were fooled. They nominated the “Milli Vanilli” of politics. They guy gives a great speech but his horrible when he has to answer the most basic questions.
Like the Milli Vanilli, I believe a lot of demos are wanting a refund.
SF Chron: Obama Voters Sexists and Easily Fooled..???
bullshit, my neice is mixed race and I love her
The entire basis of the obama campaign is that if you don’t vote for hussein you are racist and probably support the military pursuit of mass-murdering muslims. Oh, and since this is from the Chronicle, you are probably a homophobe too.
You forgot the Jewish vote...most are more liberal than they are Jewish. I’ve never understood this.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
and blah, blah, blah.
Warner's articles are always worth reading.
About the only option Hussein’s journalists have now is to declare all non-supporters as racists and homophobes.
I must admit that I don't hang out with blacks, but then I don't hang out with anyone who is unable to assimilate into the United States period.
As far as being easily fooled? I have, at times, been gullible.
For instance I had thought that that P diddy rapper dude had a brain.
I was wrong.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.