Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: originalbuckeye
I mostly agree with you, but differ somewhat on this point:

The high profile people involved with the AIDS lobby have diverted much money from cancer research by pleading for more AIDS money.

Funds for Nixon's anti-cancer initiative were running out, there was little success in prevention and cure, there was little chance of renewal of funds, and an army of cancer researchers were about to be left high and dry. Far from diverting money from cancer research, the Aids lobby provided a much needed (from the researchers point of view) infusion of cash.
30 posted on 09/07/2008 10:05:49 AM PDT by caveat emptor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: caveat emptor
In my career I have seen childhood leukemia go from a highly fatal disease to a cancer that now has a high survivability rate. Cancer research is gaining ground on may cancers. I agree that diversion was a much better word. I am looking forward to more curative medicines in the years to come.
31 posted on 09/07/2008 10:23:46 AM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson