[GodGunsGuts]

If you would like to be added to the RETHINKING AIDS PING LIST drop me a FReepmail.

AIDS is the biggest public health scam in medical history. Like global warming, AIDS is being used to push a powerful leftist political agenda. For over two decades the Public Health Establishment has used your tax dollars and the full power of the federal government to wage a massive propaganda (and intimidation) campaign designed to:

(A) prevent the American public from hearing the scientific evidence that suggests HIV may not cause AIDS
(B) scare the public into thinking "we are all at risk"
(C) coverup the extreme toxicity of AIDS chemotherapy drugs (which are not just used on "fast-track" gays and junkies, but also given to pregnant mothers, infants, and children)
(D) use this fear to push a leftist social agenda that includes socialized medicine, and the promotion of homosexuality and explicit sex "education" to tender-aged school children
(E) use their "public health mandate" to bypass the authority of parents and local school boards who object to their social engineering schemes
(F) create a massive federal bureaucracy encouraging the use of addictive drugs, to include prescription heroine
(G) use threats and intimidation to silence dissenting scientists and to keep the press from covering the debate
(H) and finally, to use AIDS as a model to push similar social agendas with respect to future epidemics.

Every single point above can be documented on my profile page.

If you would like to be added to the RETHINKING AIDS PING LIST drop me a FReepmail.

[GodGunsGuts]

ping!

[Drango]

Self inject and them come back, if you can, and tell us about your nut job theory.

[GodGunsGuts]

They're starting to catch on. From the article:

"This sort of opportunism is not confined to AIDS: in other areas where experts are broadly in sympathy with government policy – such as passive smoking, obesity and climate change – they have been similarly complicit in the prostitution of science to propaganda."

[libh8er]

[originalbuckeye]

I just said to my husband last night that the power behind the AIDS lobby was appalling. AIDS is a completely avoidable disease. I have worked in cancer detection for 34 years. The high profile people involved with the AIDS lobby have diverted much money from cancer research by pleading for more AIDS money. Happily, the fervor of the Obama supporting celebrities and MSM, the same AIDS agitators, is raising the profile of their bias. I hope that the public realizes that having a loud voice doesn't mean it is correct in it's pleadings.

[hinckley buzzard]

Chin confesses that he has found it difficult ‘to understand how, over the past decade, mainstream AIDS scientists, including most infectious disease epidemiologists, have virtually all uncritically accepted the many “glorious” myths and misconceptions UNAIDS and AIDS activists continue to perpetuate’

C'mon Chin-- follow the money. All these knuckleheads have enjoyed cushy lifestyles, travel to exotic lands and luxurious "conferences," all on the grant dollar and government dime, and made professional reputations including tenured appoinments.

LIke "global warming", HIV/AIDS pays very well if you're on the right end of things.

[yazoo]

When the AIDS epidemic crested the increase in new AIDS cases leveled off among homosexuals, because so many already had it and the rest were being more careful. The AIDS lobby then began to claim that the fastest growing group contracting AIDS was heterosexuals. Of course, given that cases among heterosexual non-IV drug users could have grown from 10 to 11 the statistic was technically correct, but incredibly misleading. This is the kind of propaganda that was being used to try and convince people AIDS was not a lifestyle issue.

[mysterio]

Save this crap for coast to coast AM. I’m sure they will love to hear this crackpot theory, right after they finish talking to the guy who is receiving radio signals from other dimensions through the mirrors in his house.

[IronJack]

the British AIDS story is an example of a ‘glorious myth’ – a tale that is ‘gloriously or nobly false’, but told ‘for a good cause’.

Ah yes, the myth of the "noble lie." A technique Joseph Goebbels used to great effect.

A lie is a lie, no matter how nobly told.

[count-your-change]

In a few words:

“As both Chin and Pisani indicate, high rates of heterosexually spread HIV infection remain the exceptional feature of sub-Saharan Africa (and parts of the Caribbean) where a particular pattern of concurrent networks of sexual partners together with high rates of other sexually transmitted infections facilitated an AIDS epidemic. Though this has had a devastating impact on many communities, Chin suggests that HIV prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa and the Caribbean has been overestimated by about 50 per cent. The good news is that, contrary to the doom-mongering of the AIDS bureaucracy, the rising annual global HIV incidence peaked in the late 1990s and the AIDS pandemic has now passed its peak.”

Along side the exaggerations of the U.N. and the “no HIV/AIDS CONNECTION” nonsense you've proffered the author accepts the conclusions of those authors he's reviewing.
Promiscuous heterosexual activity spreads other STDs and facilitates the transmission of AIDS.
AIDS is sexually transmitted.
AIDS is an “epidemic” in Africa.
Even if estimates of occurrence are exaggerated by 50% it (AIDS) has been “devastating” to many communities.

So who exactly is this AIDS bureaucracy? The U.N.? Any Dr. that says HIV causes AIDS? Exactly who is being referred to here as a bureaucracy??

In the past you've tried to support the “No HIV/AIDS Connection” nonsense with endless outdated comments from various con men and quacks, so what's the purpose of this post? More of the same?

[volunbeer]

The continued prostitution of science saddens me. Is there any doubt we will read future articles acknowledging the same motives and problems with estimates and predictions about global warming?

The diversion of cancer research funding to a behavior driven disease is unforgivable.

The squandering of wealth and food to combat a non-existent problem is unforgivable.

Both causes championed by liberalism, repeated constantly by media, and eventually bought off on by many who call themselves “conservatives”.

What will the future emergency be that follows the same pattern?