[Dilbert San Diego]

I can’t believe that the NOW crowd isn’t happy that Sarah is chipping at a glass ceiling. If the goal is women’s empowerment, women breaking glass ceilings, and women having a professional career and family life, then Sarah has it all. Sarah is an example of what feminists supposedly wanted to see more of in American women.

When did it become a rule that only liberal women are allowed to excel and break glass ceilings and advance the women’s movement?

[John Valentine]

When did it become a rule that only liberal women are allowed to excel and break glass ceilings and advance the women’s movement?

It's been that way for a couple of decades now, at least.

[TheWasteLand]

When did it become a rule that only liberal women are allowed to excel and break glass ceilings and advance the women’s movement?

It was always the rule. Look at Phyllis Schlafly, and the execrable treatment she's had at the hands of militant feminists. Politics trump everything for these sorts of people.

[Truthsearcher]

Because the feminist movement, just like the “civil rights” movement, or environmentalist movement, or the animal rights movement, or the peace movement, or the gay rights movement, all of it are just fake fronts for Marxism.

[se_ohio_young_conservative]

What makes me sick. The people who are trying to destroy Sarah are same people who were burning their bras and marching through the street for womens rights 40 years ago. The same people who claim to be “pro choice”. Evidently they are only pro choice for the people who make the choices they like. If they were genuine feminists, they would be proud of Sarah. Here is a newsflash, they are not genuine. They are being exposed for the miserable frauds that they really are. The American people are watching them collapse. It is like they are saying Sarah is not a real woman because she used her vagina for reproduction. It is twisted. They are the ones who are judgemental. If she would have had a couple of abortions or a lesbian affair, they would love her.