Skip to comments.
NYT Issues Retraction
Real Clear Politics ... The New York Times ^
| September 3, 2008
| BLAKE DVORAK
Posted on 09/06/2008 5:46:14 PM PDT by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
1
posted on
09/06/2008 5:46:14 PM PDT
by
george76
To: george76
No doubt the retraction was in Section H-5, underneath the Real Estate Classified.
2
posted on
09/06/2008 5:47:54 PM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(I am not voting for McCain - I'm voting for PALIN!)
To: george76
3
posted on
09/06/2008 5:48:37 PM PDT
by
Free ThinkerNY
((((Stop the Obamanation!))))
To: abb; SunkenCiv; LucyT; neverdem; Liz; Grampa Dave; Milhous; martin_fierro
Bumiller asserted as fact what turns out to have been an “incorrect” statement by a single, unidentified source.
Given that the story appeared on the front-page of this country’s ‘paper of record,’ we might be forgiven for expecting a slightly more rigorous standard of reporting, yet Bumiller makes no apologies...
She is completely confident in the word of a single source who has since retracted her claims?
What kind of operation are the editors at the Times running?
http://www.johnmccain.com/mccainreport/Read.aspx?guid=faa9b0ce-06ad-4c26-bfbc-e7b083e2bc2d
4
posted on
09/06/2008 5:48:55 PM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
What kind of operation are the editors at the Times running? Not a very good one!
To: george76
“What kind of operation are the editors at the Times running?”
One that is going through a death rattle.
6
posted on
09/06/2008 5:53:05 PM PDT
by
Gator113
(Drill here, drill now...... or die.)
To: george76
Think Jason Blair. Think Dan Rather
7
posted on
09/06/2008 5:53:10 PM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Conservation? Let the NE Yankees freeze.... in the dark)
To: Old Sarge
“No doubt the retraction was in Section H-5, underneath the Real Estate Classified.”
Count on it. I’m a news/political junkie, and I knew NOTHING about this retraction or about the McCain camp hitting back about it - seems I find out most of the important facts from this Board!! Thank you, Free Republic - but a real shame for the millions of voters who don’t hear the truth from any sources/media at all.
That’s SO unfair. Fox News Channel is running an hour bio on Sarah right now, but even THEY haven’t righted this wrong (to my knowledge).
8
posted on
09/06/2008 5:53:46 PM PDT
by
llandres
(I'd rather be alive and bankrupt than dead and solvent)
To: george76
Assuredly, The New York Times publishes All the News That’s Fit to Print. Unfortunately, Consumers must ascertain the fit parts from the deceptions.
To: george76
"The report was incorrect, but the future allegations are true."
10
posted on
09/06/2008 5:57:25 PM PDT
by
CASchack
To: george76
NYT writes the script for the rest of the Karaoke Media Machine (KMM). For them to admit an error is a big deal. We’ll see if the KMM picks up the retraction.
11
posted on
09/06/2008 6:00:34 PM PDT
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
To: george76
Newspapers should adopt the policy of issuing ALL retractions on the Front page, above the fold.
12
posted on
09/06/2008 6:03:34 PM PDT
by
Bryan24
(When in doubt, move to the right..........)
To: george76
Newspapers should adopt the policy of issuing ALL retractions on the Front page, above the fold.
13
posted on
09/06/2008 6:03:35 PM PDT
by
Bryan24
(When in doubt, move to the right..........)
To: george76
To: george76
The MSM is digging a deeper and deeper hole for themselves.
15
posted on
09/06/2008 6:05:52 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
(fraud -noun;(1)deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence, (2) Obama)
To: ricks_place
I still prefer the Mad Magazine version: “All the News that Fits, We Print”.
16
posted on
09/06/2008 6:11:17 PM PDT
by
Bernard
(If you always tell the truth, you never have to remember exactly what you said.)
To: george76
The jerks should be fined and forced to run the retraction on the front page for 3 consecutive days.
17
posted on
09/06/2008 6:19:39 PM PDT
by
Tempest
(The devil and the media have sided with Obama)
To: george76
What ever happened to idea of checking your sources?
18
posted on
09/06/2008 6:22:09 PM PDT
by
jerod
(They were pro-abortion, for gun control & wanted a cleaner environment at all cost - The NAZI party)
To: george76
The NYT is always issuing retractions. Lack of oversight and incompetence. Where else can you do that and get away with it all the time.
Fold you twits.
19
posted on
09/06/2008 6:25:20 PM PDT
by
alarm rider
(Peace! through superior fire power....)
To: george76
One of many, I'm sure. *bookmarked* ....
only b/c it's so apparent.....the Karaoke (MSM/DBM: APoop/NYT/WaPo/ABCNNBcBS/pBS/FauxNC) Journalists are @ it again. 
20
posted on
09/06/2008 6:29:43 PM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(If you aren't "advancing" your arguments,your losing "the battle of Ideas"...libs,hates the facts 8^)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
