Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: org.whodat

I’m sure there is a way for the song’s owners to remove themselves from the license agreement, but as I said, if they are making a public stink, that should be reason enough for the campaign to stop using the song.

A guy like Rush Limbaugh can keep using a liberal group’s song for decades just by paying the license fee and not worrying about the owner’s griping (as he has,) but in a campaign you have to think about “winning the battle but losing the war,” and it just isn’t worth it.


109 posted on 09/06/2008 2:30:21 PM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: PhatHead
There is a difference in the usage for Rush and he only uses a small clip. And they are not removing themselves from an agreement they are exercising their rights under the agreement.
112 posted on 09/06/2008 4:28:40 PM PDT by org.whodat (Republicans should support the SAM Walton business model, and then drill???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson