Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Islander7
How can 320 out of 1,000,000 air molecules have more effect on heating than that big ball of hell we orbit.

As it turns out the sun's effect is more subtle than simply getting cooler or warmer.The sun is a variable star, but it's variation in thermal output doesn't seem to be the dominate effect, (because it's so small percentage wise), on earth's climate. Variations in the magnetic field seem to have more effect. Sunspots are a "proxy" for that field.

The 1645-1715 period is know as the Maunder Minimum. In terms of the earth's climate, the same period was known as the "Little Ice Age". (Actually the little ice age started a little later, and ended quite a bit later, it was still somewhat evident during the American Revolution.)

Not to be too alarmist, but..

Today's image of the sun. The sun is blank--no sunspots.

However we are at one of the normal minimums in the sunspot cycle...but it's getting a little long in the tooth as those things go.

We are also somewhat, just a few thousand years, overdue for a Big Ice Age.

The more recent data (time runs from right to left in this graph) is "fuzzier" because there are more data points for the more recent periods, not because the temperature is varying more.

9 posted on 09/06/2008 9:48:07 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato

Thank you for a very well thought out explanation.

I am constantly amazed by the depth of knowledge and expertise FReepers possess on most any topic.

Free Republic is a learning experience. Have a great weekend!

:-)


10 posted on 09/06/2008 12:03:58 PM PDT by Islander7 ("Common sense and common decency are uncommon virtues among America's left.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: El Gato
I wish that “Yearly Averaged Sunspot Number” graph was extended just 8 more years: The difference between 1998-1999 and 2008 would be “impressive” - particularly considering how high solar cycles 22, 23 were - compared to (absence) of solar cycle 24, and the long-predicted very small size of solar cycle 25.
11 posted on 09/06/2008 3:06:21 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson