So in the two cases above, he defended the “big something or other”, and got the “little guy” screwed.
Your statement is half-right, at best. In the case of the baby-sitter, Obama's client payed the $336 bill, and the case was settled.
In the injury claim case, Obama may actually have been right - the injured person may not have been entitled to damages because of the actual facts of the case, which may not have supported the poor maintenance assertion.
I'm not defending the exaulted one by any means. But I strongly believe that we must be very, very careful to fight this sleazebag with facts when possible, and pointed questioning when facts are unavailable. To get the facts wrong could potentially build up to a miniature version of the backlash we are seeing over the Palin smearing.
Let's not make Obambi's job of hiding his record any easier by giving him even a sniff of something he could label a "smear".
And I apologize for ranting at you alone - I'm kind of writing to everyone to remind them that the facts are on our side - we don't need to create any more to destroy the clown prince of hope-shazam.