Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s law days effective but brief (WORKING FOR SLUMLORDS)
LA Times ^ | April 06, 2008 | Dan Morain

Posted on 09/06/2008 5:22:54 AM PDT by igoramus08

The head of his former firm says he did good work. But not all of it was related to voting and civil rights...

In one instance, Obama defended a nonprofit corporation that owns low-income housing projects against a lawsuit in which a man alleged that he slipped and fell because of poor maintenance. Obama got the suit dismissed.

In another case, Obama appeared on behalf of a nonprofit corporation that provided healthcare for poor people. A woman who claimed income of less than $8,000 a year had sued Obama’s client to obtain a $336 payment for baby-sitting services; Obama’s client paid up, and the case was settled.

In 1994, Obama appeared in Cook County court on behalf of Woodlawn Preservation & Investment Corp., defending it against a suit by the city, which alleged that the company failed to provide heat for low-income tenants on the South Side during the winter.

(Excerpt) Read more at articles.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: 2008; chicago; clients; lawyer; obama; obamabiden; obamarecord; obamatruthfile; slumlords
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: samtheman
John Kerry Signs Form 180 to release military records--3 of them May 20, 2005
21 posted on 09/06/2008 8:00:30 AM PDT by kabar (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist

That’s 11 years, most of it during a four year period.


22 posted on 09/06/2008 8:01:21 AM PDT by kabar (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough

From what I’ve read, associates in reasonably-sized law firms would be expected to charge from 2000-2400 hours a year. You can’t bill every single hour, but they certainly try.

Smaller firms don’t do as well because they don’t have as many different client to throw the associates on.


23 posted on 09/06/2008 8:21:30 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
So in the two cases above, he defended the “big something or other”, and got the “little guy” screwed.

Your statement is half-right, at best. In the case of the baby-sitter, Obama's client payed the $336 bill, and the case was settled.

In the injury claim case, Obama may actually have been right - the injured person may not have been entitled to damages because of the actual facts of the case, which may not have supported the poor maintenance assertion.

I'm not defending the exaulted one by any means. But I strongly believe that we must be very, very careful to fight this sleazebag with facts when possible, and pointed questioning when facts are unavailable. To get the facts wrong could potentially build up to a miniature version of the backlash we are seeing over the Palin smearing.

Let's not make Obambi's job of hiding his record any easier by giving him even a sniff of something he could label a "smear".

And I apologize for ranting at you alone - I'm kind of writing to everyone to remind them that the facts are on our side - we don't need to create any more to destroy the clown prince of hope-shazam.

24 posted on 09/06/2008 8:39:07 AM PDT by MortMan (Those who stand for nothing fall for anything. - Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
I wasn't seriously looking at the cases but was just using the usual brain dead rhetoric of his koolaid drinkers.
25 posted on 09/06/2008 9:09:52 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Sorry. With the backlash that is building over the smearing of Palin by the Dems and the media (but I repeat myself), I personally think we must be doubly sure that nothing we allege can be taken as payment-in-kind. It wouldn’t be prudent in my mind to give the opposition ammunition to blunt their self-immolation, to throw together far too many long words in a single sentence! ;-P

Have a great day, FRiend.


26 posted on 09/06/2008 9:37:47 AM PDT by MortMan (Those who stand for nothing fall for anything. - Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Sorry. With the backlash that is building over the smearing of Palin by the Dems and the media (but I repeat myself), I personally think we must be doubly sure that nothing we allege can be taken as payment-in-kind. It wouldn’t be prudent in my mind to give the opposition ammunition to blunt their self-immolation, to throw together far too many long words in a single sentence! ;-P

Have a great day, FRiend.


27 posted on 09/06/2008 9:40:54 AM PDT by MortMan (Those who stand for nothing fall for anything. - Alexander Hamilton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

I am not a psychologist nor did I take psychology courses
in college.

Can someone tell me what type of person honestly believes he is entitled to anything he wants regardless of his qualifications or experience. He appears to be a master manipulator, he acts like the victim of victims when caught in a lie, and; it is always someone else’s fault or he was unaware of anything or anyone who ever said or did anything wrong if it involves him?


28 posted on 09/07/2008 4:51:34 AM PDT by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lumper20

I believe the words you are looking for are “immature”, “childish”, or “spoiled”. I didn’t take psychology, either, but I stayed in a Holiday Inn.


29 posted on 09/07/2008 5:24:09 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Global Warming Theory is extremely robust with respect to data. All observations confirm it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

The Holiday Inn qualifies you more then I. Many years ago my wife’s daughter told her she was not street smart. My wife said-”I am smart enough to stay off the streets.”


30 posted on 09/07/2008 5:52:59 AM PDT by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson