To: Lorianne
Interesting that the women’s vote really put Bush over the top in ‘04. Considering it was a very close election, every vote counted. And, considering that the liberals/Democrats were always said to be the beneficiary of the gender gap by attracting more women’s vote. But they got a surprise that most women don’t vote on “women’s issues” such as abortion, and most women aren’t in the liberal lunatic fringe.
To: Dilbert San Diego
" Interesting that the womens vote really put Bush over the top in 04. Considering it was a very close election, every vote counted. And, considering that the liberals/Democrats were always said to be the beneficiary of the gender gap by attracting more womens vote. But they got a surprise that most women dont vote on womens issues such as abortion, and most women arent in the liberal lunatic fringe. "
Very interesting indeed.....
Would it be safe to say that women are more conservative than they were 12 ( 12 years since Clinton was elected ) - 20 years ago ? 30 years ago ?
Could the last 35 years of Liberal Feminist aborting their babies is having a devastating effect of their demographics ?
Could the old saying " Unintended Consequences " be a big understatement here ?
To: Dilbert San Diego
how strongly white women vote generally determines an election
married white women with children have favored GOP for decades
it’s when you toss in those unmarried w/o kids where it gets dicey
74 posted on
09/06/2008 11:45:47 PM PDT by
wardaddy
(Obama/Pol Pot 2008)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson